Информация предназначена только для профессионалов в области здравоохранения.
Вы можете зайти как пользователь социальных сетей
1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 2Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA; 3Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA; 4Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 5Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA; 6Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA; 7Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, New York, NY, USA; 8Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; 9Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; 10Psychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse Psychiatric Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark; 11Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 12Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; 13Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA; 14Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA; 15Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA; 16Department of Psychology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA; 17Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; 18Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 19Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 20Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; 21Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA; 22Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA; 23Department of Psychology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA; 24Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; 25Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 26Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; 27Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; 28Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA; 29Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; 30Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; 31Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA; 32 Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA; 33School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 34Department of Psychology, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA, USA; 35Department of Psychology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; 36Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; 37Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA; 38Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; 39National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia; 40Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; 41Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; 42Oak Ridge National Laboratory, University of Tennessee, Oak Ridge, TN, USA; 43Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 44Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; 45Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Список исп. литературыСкрыть список 1. Blashfield R. The classification of psychopathology: neo-kraepelinian and quantitative approaches. Berlin: Springer, 1984. 2. Cuthbert BN. The RDoC framework: facilitating transition fr om ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry 2014;13:28-35. 3. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Clarke DE et al. DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry 2013;170:59-70. 4. Lubke GH, Miller PJ. Does nature have joints worth carving? A discussion of taxometrics, model-based clustering and latent variable mixture modeling. Psychol Med 2015;45:705-15. 5. Haslam N, Holland E, Kuppens P. Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: a quantitative review of taxometric research. Psychol Med 2012;42:903-20. 6. Elahi A, Perez Algorta G, Varese F et al. Do paranoid delusions exist on a continuum with subclinical paranoia? A multi-method taxometric study. Schizophr Res 2017;190:77-81. 7. Liu RT. Substance use disorders in adolescence exist along continua: taxometric evidence in an epidemiological sample. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2017;45:1577-86. 8. Liu RT. Taxometric evidence of a dimensional latent structure for depression in an epidemiological sample of children and adolescents. Psychol Med 2016;46:1265-75. 9. Morton SE, O’Hare KJM, Maha JLK et al. Testing the validity of taxonic schizotypy using genetic and environmental risk variables. Schizophr Bull 2017;43:633-43. 10. Witte T, Holm-Denoma J, Zuromski K et al. Individuals at high risk for suicide are categorically distinct from those at low risk. Psychol Assess 2017;29:382-93. 11. Waller NG, Ross CA. The prevalence and biometric structure of pathological dissociation in the general population: taxometric and behavior genetic findings. J Abnorm Psychol 1997;106:499-510. 12. Watson D. Investigating the construct validity of the dissociative taxon: stability analyses of normal and pathological dissociation. J Abnorm Psychol 2003;112:298-305. 13. Carragher N, Krueger RF, Eaton NR et al. ADHD and the externalizing spectrum: direct comparison of categorical, continuous, and hybrid models of liability in a nationally representative sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2014;49:1307-17. 14. Conway C, Hammen C, Brennan PA. A comparison of latent class, latent trait, and factor mixture models of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria in a community setting: implications for DSM-5. J Pers Disord 2012;26:793-803. 15. Krueger RF, Markon KE, Patrick CJ et al. Externalizing psychopathology in adulthood: a dimensional-spectrum conceptualization and its implications for DSM-V. J Abnorm Psychol 2005;114:537-50. 16. Vrieze SI, Perlman G, Krueger RF et al. Is the continuity of externalizing psychopathology the same in adolescents and middle-aged adults? A test of the externalizing spectrum’s developmental coherence. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2012;40:459-70. 17. Walton KE, Ormel J, Krueger RF. The dimensional nature of externalizing behaviors in adolescence: evidence from a direct comparison of categorical, dimensional, and hybrid models. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2011;39:553-61. 18. Wright AGC, Krueger RF, Hobbs MJ et al. The structure of psychopathology: toward an expanded quantitative empirical model. J Abnorm Psychol 2013;122:281-94. 19. Eaton NR, Krueger RF, Markon KE et al. The structure and predictive validity of the internalizing disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 2013;122:86-92. 20. Forbes MK, Baillie AJ, Schniering CA. Wh ere do sexual dysfunctions fit into the meta-structure of psychopathology? A factor mixture analysis. Arch Sex Behav 2016;45:1883-96. 21. Kramer MD, Arbisi PA, Thuras PD et al. The class-dimensional structure of PTSD before and after deployment to Iraq: evidence from direct comparison of dimensional, categorical, and hybrid models. J Anxiety Disord 2016;39:1-9. 22. Klein DN, Kotov R. Course of depression in a 10-year prospective study: evidence for qualitatively distinct subgroups. J Abnorm Psychol 2016;125:337-48. 23. Lubke GH, Luningham J. Fitting latent variable mixture models. Behav Res Ther 2017;98:91-102. 24. Masyn KE, Henderson CE, Greenbaum PE. Exploring the latent structures of psychological constructs in social development using the dimensional-categorical spectrum. Soc Dev 2018;12:82-6. 25. Eaton NR, Krueger RF, South SC et al. Contrasting prototypes and dimensions in the classification of personality pathology: evidence that dimensions, but not prototypes, are robust. Psychol Med 2011;41:1151-63. 26. Zachar P, Krueger R, Kendler K. Personality disorder in DSM-5: an oral history. Psychol Med 2015;46:1-10. 27. Hopwood CJ, Kotov R, Krueger RF et al. The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis. Personal Ment Health 2018;12:82-6. 28. Forbes M, Tackett J, Markon K et al. Beyond comorbidity: toward a dimensional and hierarchical approach to understanding psychopathology across the life span. Dev Psychopathol 2016;28:971-86. 29. Lello L, Avery SG, Tellier L et al. Accurate genomic prediction of human height. bioRxiv (in press). 30. von Eye A, DeShon RP. Directional dependence in developmental research. Int J Behav Dev 2012;36:303-12. 31. Kendler KS. A joint history of the nature of genetic variation and the nature of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2015;20:77-83. 32. Okbay A, Baselmans B, De Neve J et al. Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identi- fied through genome-wide analyses. Nat Genet 2016;48:624-33. 33. Markon KE. How things fall apart: understanding the nature of internalizing through its relationship with impairment. J Abnorm Psychol 2010;119:447-58. 34. Jonas K, Markon K. A model of psychosis and its relationship with impairment. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013;48:1367-75. 35. Wakschlag LS, Estabrook R, Petitclerc A et al. Clinical implications of a dimensional approach: the normal: abnormal spectrum of early irritability. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015;54:626-34. 36. Clark LA, Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol 1991;100:316-36. 37. Möller HJ, Bandelow B, Volz HP et al. The relevance of ‘mixed anxiety and depression’ as a diagnostic category in clinical practice. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2016;266:725-36. 38. Waszczuk M, Kotov R, Ruggero C et al. Hierarchical structure of emotional disorders: from individual symptoms to the spectrum. J Abnorm Psychol 2017;126:613-34. 39. Chmielewski M, Watson D. The heterogeneous structure of schizotypal personality disorder: item-level factors of the schizotypal personality questionnaire and their associations with obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms, dissociative tendencies, and normal personality. J Abnorm Psychol 2008;117:364-76. 40. Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Bullis JR et al. The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders compared with diagnosis-specific protocols for anxiety disorders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2017;74:875-84. 41. Venables NC, Yancey JR, Kramer MD et al. Psychoneurometric assessment of dispositional liabilities for suicidal beh * avior: phenotypic and etiological associations. Psychol Med 2018;48:463-72. 42. Stony Brook School of Medicine. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). https://medicine.stonybrookmedicine.edu/ HITOP 43. Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D et al. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J Abnorm Psychol 2017;126:454-77. 44. Forbes M, Kotov R, Ruggero C et al. Delineating the joint hierarchical structure of clinical and personality disorders in an outpatient psychiatric sample. Compr Psychiatry 2017;79:19-30. 45. Carpenter WT, Bustillo JR, Thaker GK et al. The psychoses: cluster 3 of the proposed metastructure for DSM-V and ICD-11. Psychol Med 2009;39:2025-42. 46. Guloksuz S, van Os J. The slow death of the concept of schizophrenia and the painful birth of the psychosis spectrum. Psychol Med 2018;48:229-44. 47. Kotov R, Watson D, Krueger RF et al. Thought disorder spectrum of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): bridging psychosis and personality pathology. Submitted for publication. 48. Tyrer P, Crawford M, Mulder R. Reclassifying personality disorders. Lancet 2011;377:1814-5. 49. Krueger RF, Markon KE, Patrick CJ et al. Linking antisocial behavior, substance use, and personality: an integrative quantitative model of the adult externalizing spectrum. J Abnorm Psychol 2007;116:645-66. 50. Krueger R, Tackett J. The externalizing spectrum of personality and psychopathology: an empirical and quantitative alternative to discrete disorder approaches. In: Beauchaine T, Hinshaw S (eds). Oxford handbook of externalizing disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015:79-89. 51. Eaton NR, Krueger RF, Keyes KM et al. Borderline personality disorder co-morbidity: relationship to the internalizing-externalizing structure of common mental disorders. Psychol Med 2011;41:1041-50. 52. Sharp C, Wright AG, Fowler JC et al. The structure of personality pathology: both general (‘g’) and specific (‘s’) factors? J Abnorm Psychol 2015;124:387-98. 53. Caspi A, Houts RM, Belsky DW et al. The p factor: one general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clin Psychol Sci 2014;2:119-37. 54. Lahey BB, Krueger RF, Rathouz PJ et al. Validity and utility of the general factor of psychopathology. World Psychiatry 2017;16:142-4. 55. Morgan GB, Hodge KJ, Wells KE et al. Are fit indices biased in favor of bi-factor models in cognitive ability research?: a comparison of fit in correlated factors, higher-order, and bi-factor models via Monte Carlo simulations. Intelligence 2015;3:2-20. 56. Eid M, Geiser C, Koch T et al. Anomalous results in G-factor models: explanations and alternatives. Psychol Methods 2017;22:541-62. 57. Murray AL, Johnson W. The limitations of model fit in comparing the bi-factor versus higher-order models of human cognitive ability structure. Intelligence 2013;41:407-22. 58. Trull TJ, Widiger TA, Burr R. A structured interview for the assessment of the five-factor model of personality: facet-level relations to the axis II personality disorders. J Pers 2001;69:175-98. 59. Widiger TA, Presnall JR. Clinical application of the five-factor model. J Pers 2013;81:515-27. 60. Clark LA, Cuthbert B, Lewis-Fernández R et al. Three approaches to understanding and classifying mental disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Psychol Sci Public Interest 2017;18:72-145. 61. Waszczuk MA, Zimmerman M, Ruggero C et al. What do clinicians treat: diagnoses or symptoms? The incremental validity of a symptombased, dimensional characterization of emotional disorders in predicting medication prescription patterns. Compr Psychiatry 2017;79:80-8. 62. Helzer J, Kraemer H, Krueger R. The feasibility and need for dimensional psychiatric diagnoses. Psychol Med 2006;36:1671-80. 63. Gastfriend DR, Mee-Lee D. The ASAM patient placement criteria: context, concepts and continuing development. J Addict Dis 2003;1:1-8.