Информация предназначена только для профессионалов в области здравоохранения.
Вы можете зайти как пользователь социальных сетей
1 Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322; 2 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Список исп. литературыСкрыть список 1. Kendler KS. An historical framework for psychiatric nosology. Psychol Med 2009;39:1935-41. 2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 1980. 3. Phelps J, Angst J, Katzow J et al. Validity and utility of bipolar spectrum models. Bipolar Disord 2008;10:179-93. 4. Benazzi F. Bipolar II disorder and major depressive disorder: continuity or discontinuity? World Psychiatry 2003;4:166-71. 5. Cassano GB, Frank E, Miniati M et al. Conceptual underpinnings and empirical support for the mood spectrum. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2002;25:699-712. 6. Akiskal HS. The prevalent clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders: beyond DSM-IV. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1996;16:4-14S. 7. Westen D, Heim A, Morrison K et al. Simplifying diagnosis using a prototype-matching approach: Implications for the next edition of the DSM. In: Beutler LE, Malik ML (eds). Rethinking the DSM: a psychological perspective. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2002:221-50. 8. Westen D, Shedler J, Bradley R. A prototype approach to personality disorder diagnosis. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:846-56. 9. Maj M. Psychiatric diagnosis: pros and cons of prototypes vs. operational criteria. World Psychiatry 2011;10:81-2. 10. Brown TA, Barlow DH. Dimensional versus categorical classification of mental disorders in the fifth edition of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders and beyond. J Abnorm Psychol 2005;114:551-6. 11. Brown TA, Barlow DH. A proposal for a dimensional classification system based on the shared features of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: implications for assessment and treatment. Psychol Assess 2009;21:256-71. 12. Widiger TA. Personality and psychopathology. World Psychiatry 2011;10:103-6. 13. Hedlund JL, Viewig BW. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: a comprehensive review. J Operational Psychiatry 1979;10:149-65. 14. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R et al. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess 1996; 67:588-97. 15. Krueger RF, Markon KE. Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2006;2:111-33. 16. Westen D, Shedler J. Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 1: Developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:258-72. 17. Jampala V, Sierles F, Taylor M. The use of DSM-III-R in the United States: a case of not going by the book. Compr Psychiatry 1988;29:39-47. 18. Morey LC, Ochoa ES. An investigation of adherence to diagnostic criteria: clinical diagnosis of the DSM-III personality disorders. J. Pers Disord 1989;3:180-92. 19. Westen D. Prototype diagnosis of psychiatric syndromes. World Psychiatry 2012;11:16-21. 20. Westen D, Shedler J. A prototype matching approach to personality disorders: toward DSM-V. J Pers Disord 2000;14:109-26. 21. Ahn W, Kim NS, Lassaline ME et al. Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality. Cogn Psychol 2000;41:361-416. 22. Kim NS, Ahn W. Clinical psychologists’ theory-based representations of mental disorders predict their diagnostic reasoning and memory. J Exper Psychol 2002;131:451-76. 23. Horowitz LM, Post DL, de Sales French R et al. The prototype as a construct in abnormal psychology: 2. Clarifying disagreement in psychiatric judgments. J Abnorm Psychol 1981;90:575-85. 24. Westen D, Shedler J. Personality diagnosis with the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): integrating clinical and statistical measurement and prediction. J Abnorm Psychol 2007;116:810-22. 25. DeFife JA, Drill R, Nakash O et al. Agreement between clinician and patient ratings of adaptive functioning and developmental history. Am J Psychiatry 2010;167:1472-8. 26. Beck AT, Epstein N, Harrison R. Cognitions, attitudes and personality dimensions in depression. Br J Cogn Psychother 1983;1:1-16. 27. Blatt SJ, Zuroff DC. Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition: two prototypes for depression. Clin Psychol Rev 1992;12:527-62. 28. Horn J. An empirical comparison of methods for estimating factor scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1965;25:313-22. 29. O’Connor BP. SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2000;32:396-402. 30. Kendler KS, Prescott CA, Myers J et al. The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:929-37. 31. Krueger RF, Finger MS. Using item response theory to understand comorbidity among anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Psychol Assess 2001;13:140-51. 32. Kessler RC, Ormel J, Petukhova M et al. Development of lifetime comorbidity in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011;68:90-100. 33. Ortigo KM, Bradley B, Westen D. An empirically based prototype diagnostic system for DSM-V and ICD-11. In: Millon T, Krueger R, Simonsen E (eds). Contemporary directions in psychopathology: scientific foundations of the DSM-V and ICD-11. New York: Guilford, 2010:374-90. 34. Westen D, Arkowitz-Westen L. Limitations of Axis II in diagnosing personality pathology in clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:1767-71. 35. Westen D, Shedler J, Bradley B et al. An empirically derived taxonomy for personality diagnosis: bridging science and practice in conceptualizing personality. Am J Psychiatry (in press). 36. Westen D, DeFife JA, Bradley B et al. Prototype personality diagnosis in clinical practice: a viable alternative for DSM-5 and ICD-11. Prof Psychol: Res Pr 2010;41:482-7. 37. Westen D, Muderrisoglu S. Reliability and validity of personality disorder assessment using a systematic clinical interview: evaluating an alternative to structured interviews. J Pers Disord 2003;17:350-68. 38. Westen D, Muderrisoglu S. Clinical assessment of pathological personality traits. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1285-97.