Информация предназначена только для профессионалов в области здравоохранения.
Вы можете зайти как пользователь социальных сетей
1Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 2New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA; 3Departamento de Computacion, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 4Instituto de Investigacion en Ciencias de la Computacion, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 5Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 6Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, and Orygen National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia; 7Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and Psychology, University of California Los Angeles; Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 8Computational Biology Center – Neuroscience, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Ossining, NY, USA
Список исп. литературыСкрыть список 1. Roche E, Creed L, MacMahon D et al. The epidemiology and associated phenomenology of formal thought disorder: a systematic review. Schizophr Bull 2015;41:951-62. 2. Andreasen NC, Grove WM. Thought, language, and communication in schizophrenia: diagnosis and prognosis. Schizophr Bull 1986;12:348-59. 3. Gooding DC, Ott SL, Roberts SA et al. Thought disorder in mid-childhood as a predictor of adulthood diagnostic outcome: findings fr om the New York High-Risk Project. Psychol Med 2013;43:1003-12. 4. Nelson B, Yuen HP, Wood SJ et al. Long-term follow-up of a group at ultra high risk («prodromal») for psychosis: the PACE 400 study. JAMA Psychiatry 2013;70:793-802. 5. Addington J, Liu L, Buchy L et al. North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2): the prodromal symptoms. J Nerv Ment Dis 2015;203:328-35. 6. De Vylder JE, Muchomba FM, Gill KE et al. Symptom trajectories and psychosis onset in a clinical high-risk cohort: the relevance of subthreshold thought disorder. Schizophr Res 2014;159:278-83. 7. Cornblatt BA, Carrion RE, Auther A et al. Psychosis prevention: a modified clinical high risk perspective from the Recognition and Prevention (RAP) program. Am J Psychiatry 2015;172:986-94. 8. Bearden CE, Wu KN, Caplan R et al. Thought disorder and communication deviance as predictors of outcome in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;50:669-80. 9. Landauer TK, Dumais ST. A solution to Plato’s problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychol Rev 1997;104:211-40. 10. Landauer TK, Foltz PW, Laham D. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Process 1998;25:259-84. 11. Elvevag B, Foltz PW, Weinberger DR et al. Quantifying incoherence in speech: an automated methodology and novel application to schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2007;93:304-16. 12. Elvevag B, Foltz PW, Rosenstein M et al. An automated method to analyze language use in patients with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives. J Neurolinguistics 2010;23:270-84. 13. Santorini B. Part-of-speech tagging guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project. 3rd revision. Philadelphia: Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 1990. 14. Bird S. Natural language processing and linguistic fieldwork. Comput Linguist 2009;35:469-74. 15. Bedi G, Carrillo F, Cecchi GA et al. Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths. NPJ Schizophr 2015;1:15030. 16. Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Rosen JL et al. Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophr Bull 2003;29:703-15. 17. Caplan R, Guthrie D, Fish B et al. The Kiddie Formal Thought Disorder Rating Scale: clinical assessment, reliability, and validity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1989;28:408-16. 18. Ben-David S, Birnbaum ML, Eilenberg ME et al. The subjective experience of youths at clinically high risk of psychosis: a qualitative study. Psychiatr Serv 2014;65:1499-50. 19. Mandera P, Keuleers E, Brysbaert M. How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables? Q J Exp Psychol 2015;68:1623-42. 20. Shonemann P. A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika 1966;31:1-10. 21. Haxby JV, Guntupalli JS, Connolly AC et al. A common, high-dimensional model of the representational space in human ventral temporal cortex. Neuron 2011;72:404-16. 22. Ashburner J, Firston K. Rigid body registration. In: Penny W, Friston K, Ashburner J et al (eds). Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain images. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2007:49-62. 23. Mollica RF, Milic M. Social class and psychiatric practice: a revision of the Hollingshead and Redlich model. Am J Psychiatry 1986;143:12-7. 24. Jorge-Botana G, Olmos R, Luzon JM. Word maturity indices with latent semantic analysis: why, when, and wh ere is Procrustes rotation applied? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci (in press). 25. Kraepelin E. Psychiatrie. Ein Lehrbuch fur Studierende und Arzte. Leipzig: Barth, 1899. 26. Bleuler E. Dementia Praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenien. Leipzig: Deuticke, 1911. 27. Andreasen NC. Thought, language, and communication disorders. I. Clinical assessment, definition of terms, and evaluation of their reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979;36:1315-21. 28. Hoffman RE, Stopek S, Andreasen NC. A comparative study of manic vs schizophrenic speech disorganization. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986;43:831-8. 29. Noel-Jorand MC, Reinert M, Giudicelli S et al. A new approach to discourse analysis in psychiatry, applied to a schizophrenic patient’s speech. Schizophr Res 1997;25:183-98. 30. Hoffman RE, Hogben GL, Smith H et al. Message disruptions during syntactic processing in schizophrenia. J Commun Disord 1985;18:183-202. 31. Buck B, Penn DL. Lexical characteristics of emotional narratives in schizophrenia: relationships with symptoms, functioning, and social cognition. J Nerv Ment Dis 2015;203:702-8. 32. Kuperberg GR. Language in schizophrenia Part 2: What can psycholinguistics bring to the study of schizophrenia... and vice versa? Lang Linguist Compass 2010;4:590-604. 33. Andreasen NC. Thought, language, and communication disorders. II. Diagnostic significance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979;36:1325-30. 34. Nippold MA, Ward-Lonergan JM, Fanning JL. Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: a study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2005;36:125-38. 35. Silbert LJ, Honey CJ, Simony E et al. Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:E4687-96. 36. Mota NB, Vasconcelos NA, Lemos N et al. Speech graphs provide a quantitative measure of thought disorder in psychosis. PLoS One 2012;7:e34928. 37. Gutierrez ED, Shuotva E, Marghetis T et al. Literal and metaphorical senses in compositional distributional semantic models. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Berlin, 2016:183-93. 38. Bedi G, Cecchi GA, Slezak DF et al. A window into the intoxicated mind? Speech as an index of psychoactive drug effects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014;39:2340-8. 39. Garcia AM, Carrillo F, Orozco-Arroyave JR et al. How language flows when movements don’t: an automated analysis of spontaneous discourse in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Lang 2016;162:19-28. 40. Baker JT, Pennant L, Baltrusaitis T et al. Toward expert systems in mental health assessment: a computational approach to the face and voice in dyadic patient-doctor interactions. iproc 2016;2:e44.