Информация предназначена только для профессионалов в области здравоохранения.
Вы можете зайти как пользователь социальных сетей
1NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, Australia; 2Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 3Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; 4Division of Digital Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 5Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK; 6Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 7Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; 8Merton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; 9Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia; 10Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK; 11Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; 12School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; 13Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 14University Psychiatric Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 15NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; 16NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester, UK; 17Professorial Unit, The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Australia
Список исп. литературыСкрыть список 1. Pew Research Center. Internet/broadband fact sheet. Pew Research Center, February 5, 2018. 2. Perrin A, Jiang J. About a quarter of US adults say they are ‘almost constantly’ online. Pew Research Center, March 14, 2018. 3. Anderson M, Jiang J. Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center, May 31, 2018. 4. Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V et al. Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 2004;427:311. 5. Osterhout L, Poliakov A, Inoue K et al. Second-language learning and changes in the brain. J Neurolinguistics 2008;21:509-21. 6. Scholz J, Klein MC, Behrens TE et al. Training induces changes in white-matter architecture. Nature Neurosci 2009;12:1370. 7. Draganski B, Gaser C, Kempermann G et al. Temporal and spatial dynamics of brain structure changes during extensive learning. J Neurosci 2006;26:6314-7. 8. Gindrat A-D, Chytiris M, Balerna M et al. Use-dependent cortical processing from fingertips in touchscreen phone users. Curr Biol 2015;25:109-16. 9. Small GW, Moody TD, Siddarth P et al. Your brain on Google: patterns of cerebral activation during internet searching. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009;17:116-26. 10. Levy R. Aging-associated cognitive decline. Int Psychogeriatr 1994;6:63-8. 11. Hultsch DF, Hertzog C, Small BJ et al. Use it or lose it: engaged lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline in aging? Psychol Aging 1999;14:245-63. 12. Small BJ, Dixon RA, McArdle JJ et al. Do changes in lifestyle engagement moderate cognitive decline in normal aging? Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Neuropsychology 2012;26:144-55. 13. Zhou F, Montag C, Sariyska R et al. Orbitofrontal gray matter deficits as marker of Internet gaming disorder: converging evidence from a cross-sectional and prospective longitudinal design. Addict Biol 2019;24:100-9. 14. Paus T. Mapping brain maturation and cognitive development during adolescence. Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:60-8. 15. Kay M, Santos J, Takane M. mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011. 16. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon 2001;9:1-6. 17. Alter A. Irresistible: the rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. London: Penguin, 2017. 18. Wilcockson TD, Ellis DA, Shaw H. Determining typical smartphone usage: what data do we need? Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Networking 2018;21:395-8. 19. Oulasvirta A, Rattenbury T, Ma L et al. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Pers Ubiquit Comput 2012;16:105-14. 20. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G et al. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 2004;306:503-7. 21. Skinner BF. Operant behavior. Am Psychol 1963;18:503-15. 22. Purcell K, Rainie L, Heaps A et al. How teens do research in the digital world. Pew Research Center, November 1, 2012. 23. Ophir E, Nass C, Wagner AD. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009;106:15583-7. 24. Loh KK, Kanai R. How has the Internet reshaped human cognition? Neuroscientist 2016;22:506-20. 25. Uncapher MR, Wagner AD. Minds and brains of media multitaskers: current findings and future directions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2018;115:9889-96. 26. Yeykelis L, Cummings JJ, Reeves B. Multitasking on a single device: arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. J Commun 2014;64:167-92. 27. Ralph BC, Thomson DR, Cheyne JA et al. Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychol Res 2014;78:661-9. 28. Lui KF, Wong AC. Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychon Bull Rev 2012;19:647-53. 29. Moisala M, Salmela V, Hietajärvi L et al. Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults. NeuroImage 2016;134:113-21. 30. Kühn S, Gallinat J. Brains online: structural and functional correlates of habitual Internet use. Addict Biol 2015;20:415-22. 31. Loh KK, Kanai R. Higher media multi-tasking activity is associated with smaller gray-matter density in the anterior cingulate cortex. PLoS One 2014;9:e106698. 32. Peng M, Chen X, Zhao Q et al. Attentional scope is reduced by Internet use: a behavior and ERP study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0198543. 33. Rideout VJ. The Common Sense census: media use by tweens and teens. San Francisco: Common Sense Media Inc., 2015. 34. Baumgartner SE, van der Schuur WA, Lemmens JS et al. The relationship between media multitasking and attention problems in adolescents: results of two longitudinal studies. Hum Commun Res 2017;44:3-30. 35. van Der Schuur WA, Baumgartner SE, Sumter SR et al. The consequencesof media multitasking for youth: a review. Comput Human Behav 2015;53:204-15. 36. Altmann EM, Trafton JG, Hambrick DZ. Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. J Exp Psychol Gen 2014;143:215-26. 37. Baird B, Smallwood J, Mrazek MD et al. Inspired by distraction: mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychol Sci 2012;23:1117-22. 38. Colley A, Maltby J. Impact of the Internet on our lives: male and female personal perspectives. Comput Human Behav 2008;24:2005-13. 39. Vargha-Khadem F, Gadian DG, Watkins KE et al. Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. Science 1997;277:376-80. 40. Sparrow B, Liu J, Wegner DM. Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 2011;333:776. 41. Wegner DM. Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: Mullen B, Goethals GR (eds). Theories of group behavior. Basel: Springer Nature, 1987:185-208. 42. Liang DW, Moreland R, Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: the mediating role of transactive memory. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1995;21:384-93. 43. Lewis K, Herndon B. Transactive memory systems: current issues and future research directions. Organ Sci 2011;22:1254-65. 44. Henkel LA. Point-and-shoot memories: the influence of taking photos on memory for a museum tour. Psychol Sci 2014;25:396-402. 45. Wegner DM, Ward AF. The internet has become the external hard drive for our memories. Sci Am 2013;309:58-61. 46. Ward AF. Supernormal: how the Internet is changing our memories and our minds. Psychol Inq 2013;24:341-8. 47. Dong G, Potenza MN. Behavioural and brain responses related to Internet search and memory. Eur J Neurosci 2015;42:2546-54. 48. Liu X, Lin X, Zheng M et al. Internet search alters intra- and inter-regional synchronization in the temporal gyrus. Front Psychol 2018;9:260. 49. Wang Y, Wu L, Luo L et al. Short-term Internet search using makes people rely on search engines when facing unknown issues. PLoS One 2017;12:e0176325. 50. Storm BC, Stone SM, Benjamin AS. Using the Internet to access information inflates future use of the Internet to access other information. Memory 2017;25:717-23. 51. Dong G, Potenza MN. Short-term Internet-search practicing modulates brain activity during recollection. Neuroscience 2016;335:82-90. 52. Dong G, Li H, Potenza MN. Short-term internet-search training is associated with increased fractional anisotropy in the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the parietal lobe. Front Neurosci 2017;11:372. 53. Storm BC, Stone SM. Saving-enhanced memory: the benefits of saving on the learning and remembering of new information. Psychol Sci 2015;26:182-8. 54. Bell V, Bishop DVM, Przybylski AK. The debate over digital technology and young people. BMJ 2015;351:h3064. 55. Heersmink R. The Internet, cognitive enhancement, and the values of cognition. Minds and Mach 2016;26:389-407. 56. Heersmink R, Sutton J. Cognition and the Web: extended, transactive, or scaffolded. Erkenntnis (in press). 57. Barr N, Pennycook G, Stolz JA et al. The brain in your pocket: evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Comput Human Behav 2015;48:473-80. 58. Hamilton KA, Yao MZ. Blurring boundaries: effects of device features on metacognitive evaluations. Comput Human Behav 2018;89:213-20. 59. Fisher M, Goddu MK, Keil FC. Searching for explanations: how the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. J Exp Psychol Gen 2015;144:674-87. 60. Moscovitch M, Rosenbaum RS, Gilboa A et al. Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory. J Anat 2005;207:35-66. 61. Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 2008;337:a2338. 62. Smith KP, Christakis NA. Social networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol 2008;34:405-29. 63. House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science 1988;241:540-5. 64. Yang YC, Boen C, Gerken K et al. Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2016;113:578-83. 65. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000316. 66. Dunbar R. The anatomy of friendship. Trends Cogn Sci 2018;22:32-51. 67. Grabowicz PA, Ramasco JJ, Moro E et al. Social features of online networks: the strength of intermediary ties in online social media. PLoS One 2012;7:e29358. 68. Jurgenson N. When atoms meet bits: social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet 2012;4:83-91. 69. Eltantawy N, Wiest JB. Social media in the Egyptian revolution: reconsidering resource mobilization theory. Int J Commun 2011;5:1207-24. 70. Sunstein CR. # Republic. Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018. 71. Allcott H, Gentzkow M. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J Econ Perspect 2017;31:211-36. 72. Ridings CM, Gefen D. Virtual community attraction: why people hang out online. J Comput Mediat Commun 2004;10:JCMC10110. 73. Wellman B. Computer networks as social networks. Science 2001;293:2031-4. 74. Kanai R, Bahrami B, Roylance R et al. Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proc Biol Sci 2012;279:1327-34. 75. Falk EB, Bassett DS. Brain and social networks: fundamental building blocks of human experience. Trends Cogn Sci 2017;21:674-90. 76. Bickart KC, Wright CI, Dautoff RJ et al. Amygdala volume and social network size in humans. Nat Neurosci 2011;14:163. 77. Sperling R, Chua E, Cocchiarella A et al. Putting names to faces: successful encoding of associative memories activates the anterior hippocampal formation. Neuroimage 2003;20:1400-10. 78. Sperling RA, Bates JF, Cocchiarella AJ et al. Encoding novel face-name associations: a functional MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2001;14:129-39. 79. Lewis K, Kaufman J, Gonzalez M et al. Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Soc Net 2008;30:330-42. 80. Szell M, Lambiotte R, Thurner S. Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010;107:13636-41. 81. Zhou W-X, Sornette D, Hill RA et al. Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes. Proc Biol Sci 2005;272:439-44. 82. Hamilton MJ, Milne BT, Walker RS et al. The complex structure of hunter-gatherer social networks. Proc Biol Sci 2007;274:2195-203. 83. Dunbar RI. Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behav Brain Sci 1993;16:681-94. 84. Kordsmeyer T, Mac Carron P, Dunbar R. Sizes of permanent campsite communities reflect constraints on natural human communities. Curr Anthropol 2017;58:289-94. 85. Hill RA, Dunbar RI. Social network size in humans. Hum Nat 2003;14:53-72. 86. Fuchs B, Sornette D, Thurner S. Fractal multi-level organisation of human groups in a virtual world. Sci Rep 2014;4:6526. 87. Dunbar RI, Arnaboldi V, Conti M et al. The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world. Soc Net 2015;43:39-47. 88. Dunbar RI. Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? R Soc Open Sci 2016;3:150292. 89. Arnaboldi V, Passarella A, Conti M et al. Online social networks: human cognitive constraints in Facebook and Twitter personal graphs. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015. 90. Krems JA, Dunbar R. Clique size and network characteristics in hyperlink cinema. Hum Nat 2013;24:414-29. 91. Dezecache G, Dunbar RI. Sharing the joke: the size of natural laughter groups. Evol Hum Behav 2012;33:775-9. 92. Dunbar RI. The social brain hypothesis. Evol Anthropol 1998;6:178-90. 93. Sutcliffe A, Dunbar R, Binder J et al. Relationships and the social brain: integrating psychological and evolutionary perspectives. Br J Psychol 2012;103:149-68. 94. Miritello G, Moro E, Lara R et al. Time as a limited resource: communication strategy in mobile phone networks. Soc Net 2013;35:89-95. 95. Massen JJ, Sterck EH, De Vos H. Close social associations in animals and humans: functions and mechanisms of friendship. Behaviour 2010;147:1379-412. 96. Hill RA, Bentley RA, Dunbar RI. Network scaling reveals consistent fractal pattern in hierarchical mammalian societies. Biol Lett 2008;4:748-51. 97. Hobbs WR, Burke MK. Connective recovery in social networks after the death of a friend. Nat Hum Behav 2017;1:0092. 98. Firth JA, Voelkl B, Crates RA et al. Wild birds respond to flockmate loss by increasing their social network associations to others. Proc R Soc B 2017;284:20170299. 99. Sallet J, Mars RB, Noonan MP et al. The organization of dorsal frontal cortex in humans and macaques. J Neurosci 2013;33:12255-74. 100. Sutcliffe A, Dunbar R, Wang D. Modelling the evolution of social structure. PLoS One 2016;11:e0158605. 101. Firth JA, Sheldon BC, Brent LJN. Indirectly connected: simple social differences can explain the causes and apparent consequences of complex social network positions. Proc Biol Sci 2017;284: 20171939. 102. Watts DJ. A twenty-first century science. Nature 2007;445:489. 103. Bargh JA, McKenna KY. The Internet and social life. Annu Rev Psychol 2004;55:573-90. 104. Grossmann T. The role of medial prefrontal cortex in early social cognition. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:340. 105. Achterberg M, van Duijvenvoorde ACK, van der Meulen M et al. The neural and behavioral correlates of social evaluation in childhood. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2017;24:107-17. 106. Achterberg M, van Duijvenvoorde AC, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ et al. Control your anger! The neural basis of aggression regulation in response to negative social feedback. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2016;11:712-20. 107. Crone EA, Konijn EA. Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nat Commun 2018;9:588. 108. Hamm MP, Newton AS, Chisholm A et al. Prevalence and effect of cyberbullying on children and young people: a scoping review of social media studies. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:770-7. 109. Vannucci A, Flannery KM, Ohannessian CM. Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. J Affect Disord 2017;207:163-6. 110. Lin LY, Sidani JE, Shensa A et al. Association between social media use and depression among US young adults. Depress Anxiety 2016;33:323-31. 111. Common Sense Media. Social media, social life: teens reveal their experiences. https://www.commonsensemedia.org. 112. Collins RL. For better or worse: the impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychol Bull 1996;119:51. 113. Verduyn P, Ybarra O, Résibois M et al. Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Soc Issues Pol Rev 2017;11:274-302. 114. Holmgren HG, Coyne SM. Can’t stop scrolling!: pathological use of social networking sites in emerging adulthood. Addict Res Theory 2017;25:375-82. 115. Royal Society of Public Health. Status of mind: social media and young people’s mental health. London: Royal Society for Public Health, 2017. 116. Twenge JM, Joiner TE, Rogers ML et al. Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clin Psychol Sci 2017;6:3-17. 117. Twenge JM, Joiner TE, Martin G et al. Digital media may explain a substantial portion of the rise in depressive symptoms among adolescent girls: response to Daly. Clin Psychol Sci 2018;6:296-7. 118. Twenge JM, Joiner TE, Martin G et al. Amount of time online is problematic if it displaces face-to-face social interaction and sleep. Clin Psychol Sci 2018;6:456-7. 119. Gleeson JF, Cotton SM, Alvarez-Jimenez M et al. A randomized controlled trial of relapse prevention therapy for first-episode psychosis patients: outcome at 30-month follow-up. Schizophr Bull 2013;39:436-48. 120. Torous J, Larsen ME, Depp C et al. Smartphones, sensors, and machine learning to advance real-time prediction and interventions for suicide prevention: a review of current progress and next steps. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2018;20:51. 121. D’Alfonso S, Santesteban-Echarri O, Rice S et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted online social therapy for youth mental health. Front Psychol 2017;8:796. 122. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Alcazar-Corcoles MA, Gonzalez-Blanch C et al. Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: a systematic review on novel user-led interventions. Schizophr Res 2014;156:96-106. 123. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Bendall S, Lederman R et al. On the HORYZON: moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res 2013;143:143-9. 124. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Gleeson JF, Bendall S et al. Enhancing social functioning in young people at ultra high risk (UHR) for psychosis: a pilot study of a novel strengths and mindfulness-based online social therapy. Schizophr Res 2018;202:369-77. 125. Gleeson J, Lederman R, Koval P et al. Moderated online social therapy: a model for reducing stress in carers of young people diagnosed with mental health disorders. Front Psychol 2017;8:485. 126. Rice S, Gleeson J, Davey C et al. Moderated online social therapy for depression relapse prevention in young people: pilot study of a ‘next generation’ online intervention. Early Interv Psychiatry 2018;12: 613-25. 127. Insel TR. Digital phenotyping: a global tool for psychiatry. World Psychiatry 2018;17:276-7. 128. Aboujaoude E. Telemental health: why the revolution has not arrived. World Psychiatry 2018;17:277-8. 129. Bhugra D, Tasman A, Pathare S et al. The WPA-Lancet Psychiatry commission on the future of psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry 2017;4:775-818. 130. Goekint M, Bos I, Heyman E et al. Acute running stimulates hippocampal dopaminergic neurotransmission in rats, but has no influence on brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Appl Physiol 2012;112:535-41. 131. Torous J, Anderson G, Bertagnoli A et al. Towards a consensus around standards for smartphone apps and digital mental health. World Psychiatry 2019;18:97-8. 132. Torous J, Firth J. Bridging the dichotomy of actual versus aspirational digital health. World Psychiatry 2018;17:108-9. 133. Gleeson J, Lederman R, Herrman H et al. Moderated online social therapy for carers of young people recovering from first-episode psychosis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:27. 134. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Bendall S, Koval P et al. The Horyzons trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a moderated online social therapy to maintain treatment effects from first episode psychosis services. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024104. 135. Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Asano K et al. Impact of frequency of internet use on development of brain structures and verbal intelligence: longitudinal analyses. Hum Brain Mapp 2018;39:4471-79. 136. Kühn S, Gleich T, Lorenz RC et al. Playing Super Mario induces structural brain plasticity: gray matter changes resulting from training with a commercial video game. Mol Psychiatry 2014;19:265-71. 137. Anguera JA, Boccanfuso J, Rintoul JL et al. Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature 2013;501:97-101. 138. Oh SJ, Seo S, Lee JH et al. Effects of smartphone-based memory training for older adults with subjective memory complaints: a randomized controlled trial. Aging Ment Health 2018;22:526-34. 139. Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM (eds). Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 1-34.