Информация предназначена только для профессионалов в области здравоохранения.
Вы можете зайти как пользователь социальных сетей
ГБОУ ВПО Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет им. Н.И.Пирогова Минздрава России, Москва
Список исп. литературыСкрыть список 1. Крылов В.И. Клиническая психопатология и доказательная медицина (проблема методологии диагноза). Психиатрия и психофармакотерапия. 2011; 4: 9–13. 2. Berrios GE, Markova IS. Is the concept of «dimension» applicable to psychiatric objects? World Psychiatry 2013; 12 (1): 76–8. 3. Carroll B. Biomarkers in DSM-5: lost in translation. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2013; 47 (7): 676–8. 4. Cuthbert B, Insel T. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Med 2013; 11: 126–35. 5. Cuthbert B. Research domain criteria: toward future psychiatric nosology. Asian J Psychiatr 2014; 7 (1): 4–5. 6. Cuthbert B. The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry 2014; 13 (1): 28–35. 7. Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association, 2013; p. 7. 8. Fava G. Road to nowhere. World Psychiatry 2014; 13: 49–50. 9. Frances A. The past, present and future of psychiatric diagnosis. World Psychiatry 2012; 2: 111–3. 10. Frances A. RDoC is necessary, but oversold. World Psychiatry 2014; 13: 47–9. 11. Horowitz LM et al. The prototype as a construct in abnormal psychology: 2. Clarifying disagreement inpsychiatric judgments. J Abnorm Psychol 1981; 90: 575–85. 12. Insel T, Lieberman J. DSM and RDoC: Shared Interests. 2013. URL: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/news/science-news/2013/dsm-5-and-rdoc-shared-interests.shtml 13. Jablensky A. Towards a revised classification of schizophrenia spectrum disorders in ICD-11. In: WPA International Congress, 2012; Abstracts p. 20. 14. Kendell R et al. Diagnostic criteria of American and British psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1971; 25: 123–30. 15. Kendell R, Jablensky A. Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160 (1): 4–12. 16. Kendler KS, Gardner CO. Boundaries of major depression: an evaluation of DSM-IV criteria. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155 (2): 172–7. 17. Kraemer HC et al. Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: methodological challenges. J Psychiatr Res 2004; 38 (1): 17–25. 18. Kroenke K. Diagnostic testing and the illusory reassurance of normal results: comment on «Reassurance after diagnostic testing with a low pretest probability of serious disease». JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173 (6): 416–7. 19. Kupfer D et al. A research agenda for DSM-V. Washington: APA, 2002. 20. Kupfer D. Neuroscience – Informed nosology in psychiatry: are we there yet? Asian J Psychiatr 2014; 7: 4–5. 21. Maj M. Psychiatric diagnosis: pros and cons of prototypes vs. operational criteria. World Psychiatry 2011; 10: 81–2. 22. Maj M. Mental disorders as «brain diseases» and Jaspers’ legacy. World Psychiatry 2013; 12: 1–2. 23. Maj M. Keeping an open attitude toward the RDoC project. World Psychiatry 2014; 13: 1–2. 24. Maj M. DSM, ICD, RDoC, and psychiatry’s shifting seas. EPA Congress News. 3 March 2014; p. 4. 25. Morey LC, Ochoa ES. An investigation of adherence to diagnostic criteria: clinical diagnosis of the DSM-III personality disorders. J Pers Disord 1989; 3: 180–92. 26. NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). URL: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/research-priorities/rdoc/nimh-research-domain-criteria-rdoc.shtml#toc_matrix 27. Pull Ch. Too few or too many? Reactions to removing versus retaining specific personality disorders in DSM-5. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2013; 26 (1): 73–8. 28. Reed GM et al. The WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists’ Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification. World Psychiatry 2011; 10: 118–31. 29. Regier D, Narrow W (eds.) The conceptual Evolution of DSM-5. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., 2011. 30. Regier DA et al. The DSM-5: classification and criteria changes. World Psychiatry 2013; 12: 92–9. 31. Rosenhan DL. On being sane in insane places. Science 1973; 179: 250–8. 32. Sanislow C et al. Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria. J Abnorm Psychol 2010; 119 (4): 631–9. 33. Sartorius N. The only one or one of many? World Psychiatry 2014; 13: 50–1. 34. Stein D. An integrative approach to psychiatric diagnosis and research. World Psychiatry 2014; 13: 51–2. 35. van Os J et al. Beyond DSM and ICD: introducing «precision diagnosis» for psychiatry using momentary assessment technology. World Psychiatry 2013; 12 (2): 113–7. 36. van Os J et al. Psychiatry beyond labels: introducing contextual precision diagnosis across stages of psychopathology. Psychol Med 2013; 43 (7): 1563–7. 37. van Os J. De DSM voorbij! Persoonlijke diagnostiek in een nieuwe ggz. 2014. 38. Weinberger D. RDoC redux. World Psychiatry 2014; 13: 36–7. 39. Westen D et al. Simplifying diagnosis using a prototype-matching approach: Implications for the next edition of the DSM. In: Beutler LE, Malik ML (eds). Rethinking the DSM: a psychological perspective. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2002; p. 221–50. 40. Westen et al. An empirically derived approach to the classification and diagnosis of mood disorders. World Psychiatry 2012; 11: 172–80.